Robert Sipko v. Koger Inc
Robert Sipko v. Koger Inc
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3819-22 ROBERT SIPKO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KOGER, INC., KOGER DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS, INC., KOGER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., KOGER LIMITED (DUBLIN), and GEORGE SIPKO, Defendants, and RASTISLAV SIPKO, Defendant-Appellant.
Argued October 9, 2024 – Decided December 4, 2024 Before Judges Currier and Paganelli.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Bergen County, Docket No. C- 000393-07.
Daniel J. Cohen argued the cause for appellant (Newman, Simpson & Cohen, LLP, attorneys; Daniel J.
Cohen and Daniel C. Stark, on the briefs).
Michael S. Stein argued the cause for defendant (Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, PC, attorneys; Michael S. Stein, of counsel; Erik M. Corlett and Timothy P. Malone, on the brief).
PER CURIAM We have been advised this matter has been amicably adjusted, and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
A-3819-22
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.