New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division, 2026

Jane Doe, C.D., Etc. v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC

Jane Doe, C.D., Etc. v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Decided February 17, 2026
Jane Doe, C.D., Etc. v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC

Opinion

RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited . R. 1:36-3.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0181-24 JANE DOE, C.D., c/o LAFFEY BUCCI & KENT, LLP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MASSAGE ENVY FRANCHISING, LLC, and SUMMERWIND MASSAGE, LLC, d/b/a MASSAGE ENVY CLOSTER, Defendants-Respondents. _____________________________ MASSAGE ENVY FRANCHISING, LLC, Third-Party Plaintiff- Respondent, v. MICHAEL EGAN, Third-Party Defendant. ______________________________ Submitted February 3, 2026 – Decided February 17, 2026 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Rose.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L-0440-20.

Brian D. Kent (Laffey Bucci D'Andrea Reich & Ryan, LLP) and M. Stewart Ryan (Laffey Bucci D'Andrea Reich & Ryan, LLP), attorneys for appellant.

Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis, LLP, attorneys for respondents (Darren C. Barreiro, Kersten Kortbawi, of counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAM The parties to the appeal have settled the issues between them. In accordance with the stipulation they have filed, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dismissed.

A-0181-24

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.