New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1842

Bruen v. Bragaw

Bruen v. Bragaw
New Jersey Court of Chancery · Decided October 15, 1842
3 N.J. Eq. 261

Counsel

G. Parker, on behalf of the complainants,

Bruen v. Bragaw

Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The demurrer presents for decision in this case, the sole question, whether lands acquired after the execution of a will, will pass by a devise in the residuary clause of that will. I take it to be well settled, that they will not. The devise is in the nature of a conveyance,and it can effect no lands purchased after the will is executed. This is clearly the rule of the English law, and in most of the states, except where a change is made by statute: 3 John. Chan. 310; 4 Kent’s Com. 510; 9 John. 312; 6 Mass. 149; 11 Modern, 121; 1 Salk. 237; Saxton, 229.

The demurrer must, therefore, be overruled with costs.

Order accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.