New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1843

Howell v. Hester

Howell v. Hester
New Jersey Court of Chancery · Decided January 15, 1843
3 N.J. Eq. 266

Counsel

H. W. Green, for petitioner,, S. G. Potts, contra.

Howell v. Hester

Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The case is within the principle of the authorities cited. The sale must be set aside, and a re-sale made, upon the payment, by the petitioner, of the expenses of the first sale, and the costs of this motion

Cited in Marlatt v. Warwick, 3 C. E. Gr. 123; Kloepping v. Stillmacher, 6 C. E. Gr. 330; Nat. Bk. of Metropolis v. Sprague, Id. 461: Wetzler v. Schawman, 9 C. E. Gr. 64.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.