New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1845

Kay v. Executors of Kay

Kay v. Executors of Kay
New Jersey Court of Chancery · Decided January 15, 1845
3 N.J. Eq. 495

Counsel

Carpenter, for complainant., Browning, for defendants.

Kay v. Executors of Kay

Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The complainant is entitled to the relief sought. He takes an absolute interest in the personal estate *503bequeathed to him in the residuary clause of the will, and is entitled to a decree that the whole amount be paid to him. The costs must be paid out of the general estate of the testator.

Decree accordingly.

Cited in Fairchild v. Crane, 2 Beas. 108; Den. v. Baldwin, 1 Zab. 400.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.