Bennett v. Hadsell
Bennett v. Hadsell
23 N.J. Eq. 174
Opinion of the Court
The evidence in this case shows clearly that Hadsell agreed to pay C. H. Bennett $100 for his services in getting the money for which the mortgage was given. C. H. Bennett advanced the money himself, the mortgage was given to him, and he retained $100 of the $800, for which the mortgage was given. This is usury. The assignee, even without notice of the usury, takes subject to that defence.
Let there bé a decree for $700, without interest or costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.