Van Houten v. Post
Opinion of the Court
The object of this suit is to obtain for the parties interested therein the benefit of a devise in the will of Rachel Van Houten, deceased, by which she directed her executors and trustees to sell
The bill states that the testatrix during her lifetime, from the death of her husband, under whose will she derived her title, and her executors and trustees since her death, have paid all the taxes and assessments upon the property. It appears, however, that the taxes assessed since 1873 are unpaid; that from 1863 to 1873 they were paid out of the estate at large, and that the taxes for 1873 were paid by the devisees of the property. Elizabeth Hall, by her answer, insists that the unpaid taxes should be paid out of the moneys of the estate, or by the persons who were the executors and trustees under the will, and not out of the proceeds of the sale of the property or by those entitled to the property. The executors have taken all the profits of the premises (four or five acres of unimproved land) since the death of the testatrix. They have not paid the taxes since 1873, because they'had no funds of the estate with which to do so. Since the testatrix’s death the taxes have been assessed to her estate. It is clear that the unpaid taxes upon the property in question are not chargeable upon the residue of the estate, but ought to be paid by the owners of the property. The accumulation of those taxes is due to the fact that the parties interested under the devise have so long delayed filing their bill for the relief which is sought in this cause. The devise is in substance a gift of the property to the persons among whom the proceeds are, under it, to be divided. It is a specific gift to them, and it should bear the burden of the taxes imposed upon it.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.