New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1907

Ferrell v. Strong

Ferrell v. Strong
New Jersey Court of Chancery · Decided May 28, 1907 · Beaming
73 N.J. Eq. 242; 66 A. 920; 1907 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 69

Counsel

Mr. John Boyd AviSj for the complainant., Mr. G. Dore Cogswell, for the defendant.

Ferrell v. Strong

Opinion of the Court

Beaming, Y. O.

A more careful consideration of this ease confirms the views expressed by me at the hearing.

• The facts set forth in the bill disclose an estate' in the lands in question, which can onty be ascertained and asserted in a court of equity. In the pending action at law against complainant these rights cannot be asserted, and she is in consequence entitled to have further proceedings in the law court suspended until a decree may be had under the present bill in equity. Atlantic City Railway Co. v. Johanson, 65 Atl. Rep. 719. 1 will advise a decree accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.