New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1924

Taylor v. Hahle

Taylor v. Hahle
New Jersey Court of Chancery · Decided June 25, 1924 · Ingersoll
2 N.J. Misc. 593; 1924 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 139

Counsel

Messrs. Palmer & Poviell, for the complainant., Mr. George M. Hillman % for the defendants.

Taylor v. Hahle

Opinion of the Court

iNGERSOLL, Y. C.

I am unable to advise a decree in favor of the complainant, lie has offered to pay for the houses in cash, and eliminate the question of whether the heaters installed by him were of sufficient capacity. The properties, however, are in the possession of others by virtue of agreements to purchase, made prior to the filing of the bill.

The complainant is eni itled, however, to payment for work done by him upon the property, and a reference will be made to a master for this purpose. Leave to amend, if found necessary, may be applied for.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.