CITIZENS BANK, N.A. v. FINE ENTERPRISES, INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey

CITIZENS BANK, N.A. v. FINE ENTERPRISES, INC.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CITIZENS BANK N.A., : : Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez Plaintiff, : : Civil No. 19-12494 v. : : FINE ENTERPRISES INC., STAR : TRANSPORT LLC, and DHARMINDER : ORDER SETHI, : : Defendants. :

This matter having come before the Court on Motion of Plaintiff Citizens Bank N.A. for default judgment [Dkt. No. 7] against Defendants Fine Enterprises Inc., Star Transport LLC, and Dharminder Sethi; and the Clerk having entered default on July 30, 2019; and the Court having reviewed Plaintiff’s written submissions, including the Affidavit of Edward Marchese in Support of Request for Entry of Default Judgment and the Certification of Non-Military Service, attached as Exhibit A; and the Court, accepting the allegations in the Complaint as true, finding that: 1. Default is permissible because “the unchallenged facts constitute a legitimate cause of action” DirecTV, Inc. v. Asher, No. 03-1969,

2006 WL 680533

, at *1 (D.N.J. Mar. 14, 2006) (citing Charles A. Wright, 10A Federal Practice and Procedure § 2688, at 58-59, 63 (3d ed. 1998)); and 2. The Plaintiff will suffer prejudice if the motion is denied, the Defendants, who have not answered, do not appear to have a meritorious defense, and there does not appear to be a legitimate reason for Defendants’ delay in responding to this action, Nautilus Ins. Co. v. Triple C Constr. Co., No. 10-2164,

2011 WL 42889

, at *5 (D.N.J. Jan. 6, 2011); and 3. The Defendants are properly in default, having been served with the Summonses and the Complaint on July 8, 2019, Affidavits of Service [Dkt. Nos. 3-5], and having not answered or otherwise responded; and 4. Plaintiff has set forth, through the Affidavit of Edward Marchese, justification

of damages for a sum certain and entitlement to post-judgment interest pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1961

; and 5. Plaintiff is entitled to a Judgment of $2,202,036.86 plus post-judgment interest as follows: a. $1,805,529.54 in outstanding principal; b. $250,012.26 in accumulated and owed interest; c. $115,048.35 in late charges; d. $31,446.71 in attorneys fees and costs;

Therefore, IT IS on this 23rd Day of September, 2019, hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [Dkt. No. 7] is granted.

s/ Joseph H. Rodriguez Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown