NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

LYNN SMITH, Civ. No. 19-19189 Appellant, OPINION v.

ANDREA DOBIN,

Appellee.

THOMPSON, U.S.D.J. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on the Application filed by Appellant Lynn Smith (“Appellant”) to proceed in forma pauperis, pursuant to

. (ECF No. 1-2.) For the reasons stated herein, Appellant’s Application is denied. LEGAL STANDARD In considering an application to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court generally conducts a two-step analysis. See Roman v. Jeffes,

, 194 n.1 (3d Cir. 1990). First, the Court determines whether the plaintiff is eligible to proceed under

(a). To satisfy this initial inquiry, the litigant must file an application that includes an affidavit of indigence stating the individual’s total income, assets, and inability to pay filing fees. See § 1915(a)(1); Glenn v. Hayman,

, at *7 (D.N.J. Jan. 30, 2007). Second, the Court determines whether the complaint should be dismissed. A complaint may be subject to sua sponte dismissal if the complaint is frivolous, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks money damages from defendants who are immune from such relief. See § 1915(e)(2)(B); Roman,

n.1. As under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[t]o survive dismissal, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Schreane v. Seana,

(3d Cir. 2012) (per curiam) (citations omitted). DISCUSSION

In this case, Appellant has not filed an affidavit of indigence stating her income, assets, and inability to pay filing fees. See Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis—Non Prisoner (AO 239), http://www.njd.uscourts.gov/forms/application-proceed-forma-pauperis-non-prisoner- ao-239 (last visited Oct. 28, 2019) (providing an appropriate template for the required affidavit). Instead, Appellant attaches to her Application an image of her bank account balance. (ECF No. 1-2.) Appellant states that she has been evicted from her home and that the Court has “several times previously granted In Forma Pauperis status when [Appellant] was far less indigent than she presently is.” (Id.) However, Appellant’s financial situation cannot be assessed properly without an affidavit as required by § 1915(a). Appellant’s Application therefore fails at step one, and the Court need not consider step two of the inquiry.

CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Appellant’s Application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. An appropriate Order will follow.

Date: October 30, 2019 /s/ Anne E. Thompson _ ANNE E. THOMPSON, U.S.D.J.