BORBON v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD

District Court, D. New Jersey

BORBON v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

JUAN BORBON, 1:20-cv-7188 (NLH)

Petitioner, MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

v.

NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, et al.,

Respondents.

APPEARANCES:

Juan Borbon 933272B Southern State Correctional Facility 4295 Route 47 Unit 8R Delmont, NJ 08314

Petitioner pro se

HILLMAN, District Judge WHEREAS, Petitioner Juan Borbon filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

challenging the New Jersey State Parole Board’s decision denying him release in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, see ECF No. 1; and WHEREAS, “a habeas corpus petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

is the only proper mechanism for a state prisoner to challenge the ‘fact or duration’ of his state confinement.” McKnight v. United States,

27 F. Supp. 3d 575, 587

(D.N.J. 2014). This includes challenges to parole determinations, id.; and WHEREAS, this Court is required to notify Petitioner of the

legal consequences of filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus under § 2254 and to advise him of his options. Mason v. Meyers,

208 F.3d 414

(3d Cir. 2000). Pursuant to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”),

22 U.S.C. § 2244

, a prisoner challenging the legality of a sentence imposed by a state court under § 2254 must include all potential claims in a single, comprehensive petition which must be filed within one year of the date when the judgment of conviction became final. Except in very limited circumstances, a prisoner is barred from filing a second or successive habeas corpus petition; and WHEREAS, Petitioner may now tell the Court how he wants to

proceed by choosing one of the following options and notifying the Clerk of his choice pursuant to the terms of this Order. Accordingly, Petitioner may: a. Convert his petition to a § 2254 petition;

b. Have the Court review the petition under § 2241 as filed.

Under option (a), the Court will convert the § 2241 petition to a § 2254 petition and screen under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Proceedings. Petitioner will lose his ability to file a second or successive petition under § 2254 challenging this state judgment absent certification by the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and extraordinary circumstances; and

WHEREAS, if Petitioner chooses option (b), the Court will screen the petition under § 2241. If the Court determines the relief requested may only be granted under § 2254, the Court will dismiss the § 2241 petition without prejudice; and WHEREAS, if the Court receives no communication from Petitioner within 21 days of this Order, it will presume Petitioner has no objection to proceeding under § 2254, THEREFORE, IT IS on this 13th day of July, 2020 ORDERED that Petitioner has 21 days from the date of this Order to file with the Clerk a letter or other written response signed by Petitioner advising the Court how he would like to proceed; and it is further

ORDERED that if Petitioner does not file a signed response within 21 days of this Order, the Court will convert the petition into a § 2254 petition and review the amended petition under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Proceedings; and it is finally ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Petitioner by regular mail.

s/ Noel L. Hillman At Camden, New Jersey NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.

Reference

Status
Unknown