AIGBEKAEN v. HURWITZ

District Court, D. New Jersey

AIGBEKAEN v. HURWITZ

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ______________________________ : RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN, : : No. 20-cv-1517 (NLH)(KMW) Plaintiff, : : v. : MEMORANDUM OPINION : : HURWITZ, et al., : : Defendants. : ______________________________:

IT APPEARING THAT: 1. Plaintiff Raymond Aigbekaen filed a complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). ECF No. 1. 2. On August 5, 2021, mail sent to Plaintiff at his address of record was returned as undeliverable. ECF No. 12. 3. The returned envelope is marked “Return to Sender, Refused, Unable to forward.” Id. 4. Plaintiff has not communicated with the Court regarding his new address, in violation of Local Civil Rule 10.1. See L. Civ. R. 10.1(a) (“Counsel and/or unrepresented parties must advise the Court of any change in their or their client’s address within seven days of being apprised of such change by filing a notice of said change with the Clerk.”). 5. The Clerk of the Court will be ordered to 1 administratively terminate this case. Plaintiff may reopen this matter by submitting his updated address. 6. An appropriate order follows.

Dated: August 27, 2021 s/ Noel L. Hillman At Camden, New Jersey NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.

2

Reference

Status
Unknown