District Court, D. New Jersey, 2021

MERCADO v. TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.

MERCADO v. TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey · Decided November 1, 2021
MERCADO v. TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE

MARIA ELENA MERCADO, Plaintiff, Civil No. 21-13631 (RMB/AMD) v. TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES, ORDER INC., et al., Defendants.

RENÉE MARIE BUMB, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff Maria Elena Mercado’s Motion for Default Judgment [Docket No. 12] and Defendants’ Opposition thereto [Docket No. 15]. In order to obtain default judgment under FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 55(b), a plaintiff must first secure an entry of default from the Clerk of the Court under Rule 55(a). Allaham v. Naddaf, 635 F. App’x 32, 36 (3d Cir. 2015).

Only after the Clerk of the Court has entered default may the plaintiff move for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2). FED. R. CIV. P. 55.

Here, Plaintiff has not secured entry of default from the Clerk of the Court.

Thus, her Motion for Default is premature. Therefore, IT IS this 1st day of November 2021, hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [Docket No. 12] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature.

s/Renée Marie Bumb Renée Marie Bumb United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.