ZAAROUR v. MURPHY
ZAAROUR v. MURPHY
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
: ALI K ZAAROUR, : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No. 21-20782 (JXN)(CLW) : v. : MEMORANDUM ORDER : RONALD T MURPHY, : : Defendant. : : : :
NEALS, District Judge: Currently pending before the Court is a motion for default judgment [ECF No. 19] filed by Plaintiff Ali K. Zaarour, to which Defendant has opposed [ECF No. 24] and Plaintiff has replied [ECF No. 25]. The matter is ripe and the Court decides the matter without oral argument under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Local Civil Rule 78.1(b). In the motion, Plaintiff contends that Defendant failed to comply with the Court’s discovery orders and to appear for his deposition. See ECF No. 21. In response, Defendant submits that he was not personally responsible for his failure to cooperate in discovery because he was incarcerated and unavailable. ECF No. 24. While the decision to enter default judgment is left principally to the discretion of the district court, there is a well-established preference in the Third Circuit for cases to be decided on the merits rather than by default judgment whenever practicable. Hritz v. Woma Corp.,
732 F.2d 1178, 1180–81 (3d Cir. 1984). Since Plaintiff filed his motion, Defendant has actively participated in this litigation. Defendant has worked with Plaintiff to complete discovery and has participated in several conferences with the Court. Given the Court’s preference to decide issues on the merits rather than by default judgment, Plaintiff motion for default judgment [ECF No. 19] is DENIED.
s/ Julien Xavier Neals DATED: May 25, 2023 JULIEN XAVIER NEALS United States District Judge
2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown