Riggs v. Tyson

Supreme Court of New Jersey May 15, 1790

Riggs v. Tyson, 1 N.J.L. 34 (N.J. 1790)

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

On an abatement no costs are recoverable at law, (a) and this being an entire judgment, cannot be affirmed in pai't and reversed in part, (b) but must be reversed altogether.

Note.— On the first point See Hullock's Law of costs 131 Sayer’s Law of costs. 300. 301. 302. Allen v. Maxey, Barnes 120. Pockling v. Peck, 1 Str. 638.

On the second point See Jackson v. Commonwealth, 2 Birr 79. 2 Bac. Abr. 500.

Reference

Full Case Name: Riggs and another, Executors of Riggs against Tyson
Status: Published