Riggs v. Tyson

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Riggs v. Tyson, 1 N.J.L. 39 (N.J. 1790)

Riggs v. Tyson

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

On an abatement no costs are recoverable at law, (a) and this being an entire judgment, cannot be affirmed in part and reversed in part, (b) but must be reversed altogether.

Cited in Krumerick v. Krumerick, 2 Gr. 42.

On the first point, see Hullock’s Law of Costs 131; Sayer’s Law of Costs 300, 301, 302; Allen v. Maxey, Barnes 120; Poekling v. Peck, 1 Str. 638.

On the second point, see Jackson v. Commonwealth, 2 Bin. 79; 2 Bac. Abr. 500.

Reference

Full Case Name
RIGGS AND ANOTHER, EXECUTORS OF RIGGS v. TYSON
Status
Published