In this case the court held that when a writ of error is brought upon a judgment by confession, and such judgment is affirmed, single costs only can be taxed; double costs are allowed only after verdict.

Note — See Stat. 13 Car. II, cap. 2, § 10 ; Hullock’s Law of Costs 280; Sayer’s L. of C. 204; 1 Richardson’s C. P. 250; 2 Sellon’s Pr. 444 ; 211 Bl. 286.