Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1791

Armstrong v. Davis

Armstrong v. Davis
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 15, 1791 · Our
1 N.J.L. 130

Armstrong v. Davis

Opinion of the Court

Per Our.

The rule must be made absolute. We know of no other rules of proceeding respecting the liability of *131bail, than those which regulate it in the courts of Westminster. Without these, we are without any. I look upon the practice in this case to depend upon rules of court, and these rules on reason and justice. On the return of a ca. sa. non est inventus, the bail is bound. The extension of the time upon the sci. fa., I take to be founded on rules of practice.

The proceedings were stayed, and the bail exonerated.

Cited in Boggs v. Chichester, 1 Gr. 211; Kinny v. Muloch, 2 Harr. 335 ; Van Winkle v. Alling, 2 Harr. 448.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.