Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1793

Board of Justices v. Fennimore

Board of Justices v. Fennimore
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 15, 1793 · Cur
1 N.J.L. 190

Counsel

On the trial one Thomas Gardiner, Leake objected to.the admission of parol testimony to prove these facts,, Leake contra., Stockton in reply,

Board of Justices v. Fennimore

Opinion of the Court

Per Cur.

Where commissioners are appointed to act judicially, their decisions, like the decisions of all other tribunals having jurisdiction, are conclusive, until legally and regularly invalidated. But where persons act as agents for a body, or a party, their settlement has no other effect than any private settlement, which may be shown to be erroneous or set aside for fraud. The case in Strange is of the former class of cases and clearly distinguishable from the present, (b)

Note — See Nimmo’s Executor v. Commonwealth 4 Hen. and Munf. 57.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.