State v. Pitney
State v. Pitney
Opinion of the Court
Qn Habeas Corpus of Negro James, a Boy about Thirteen Tears of Age, claiming his Freedom.
THE Cafe upon the Habeas Corpus and Return, coming before the Court appeared to be as follows,
Jafper Smith of the Townfmp of Maidenhead, in the County of Hunterdon, by Will bearing Date the 29th Day of November, 1769, (amongft others) made the following Devife, “ And as for all my Negroes, Jack, old *v Juddy, and young Juddy, with all her Children, cud “ with all their Cloaths, Chefts, Beds, and Bedding, af- (< ter my Deceafe, I do hereby order that they are all
The Court having taken due C moiifly of Opinion, That the faid ther off he faid Jake's, was a free the laid Jafper Smith, the want < the faid Aft of Affernbly notwitk ration, are unani-Jyiddy the Mo-ntan by the Will of ecurity purfuant to nding, and that con-fequently the laid James her Son is entitled to his f reedom, and do therefore Order, that the laid James be dif-dharged from the illegal Detention of the faid James Pit-hey, and he is difeharged accordingly, on the Motion of Mr. Bloomfield for the State.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The State against James Pitney of the County of Morris
- Status
- Published