Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1794

Hall v. Bray

Hall v. Bray
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided April 15, 1794 · Cur
1 N.J.L. 212

Hall v. Bray

Opinion of the Court

Per Cur.

Such an agreement is no revocation at law. An intention to sell does not revoke a will by which the property is devised. In equity perhaps it may be considered as an absolute disposition, Powell on Dev. 565, 593, 4. Abney v. *213Miller (a) Rider v. Wager (b) Cotter v. Layer (c) Willet v. Sandford (d) Vernon v. Jones (e) Archer v. Bokenham. (f)

2 Aik. 593.

2 o Wins. 328.

Ibid 623.

1 Vesey. 177.

2 Veru. 241. Free, in Chey. 32.

H Mod. 148. Note. See 1131. Rep. 349.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.