Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1794

Hall v. Bray

Hall v. Bray
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided April 15, 1794 · Cur
1 N.J.L. 245

Hall v. Bray

Opinion of the Court

Per Cur.

Such an agreement is no revocation at law. An intention to sell does hot revoke a will by which the property is devised. In equity, perhaps, it may be considered as an absolute disposition. Powell on Dev. 565, 593 — 4; Abney v. [213] Miller, 2 Atk. 593; Rider v. Wager, 2 P. Wms. 328; Cotter v. Layer, Ibid. 623; Willet v. Sandford, 1 Vesey 177; Vernon v. Jones, 2 Vern. 241 ; Prec, in Chey.32; Archer v. Bokenham, 11 Mod. 148. See 1 Bl. Rep. 349.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.