Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1795

State v. Hunt

State v. Hunt
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided April 15, 1795 · Cue
1 N.J.L. 332

State v. Hunt

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cue.

A rule to show cause is a proper notice in all cases.

Leake and Woodruff,, for the rule, cited

2 Hawk. 417, b. 2, c. 27, § 62; 4 Bl. Com. 320, 321, to show that a certiorari was a supersedeas ; and that after it was presented all further proceedings were void. A case, also, of The State v. Bowen, in the minutes of May Term, 1781, was cited, where, for proceeding after a certiorari, the court ordered an attachment in the first instance against the justices.

[288] Per Cur. This is a mild way of proceeding. The court that issues the writ are alone to decide upon its legality. The inferior court are to obey.

Rule absolute.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.