State v. Fisler

Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Fisler, 6 N.J.L. 371 (N.J. 1796)

State v. Fisler

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The answers must be made ore tenus.

The defendant being then called up and sworn, the interrogatories were severally proposed to him, and he answered them from a printed paper,* which he held in his hand, containing answers to each of the interrogatories; after-wards he signed the printed answers, and they were annexed to the interrogatory.

The counsel had the, answers printed, because the defendant was incapable of reading manuscript, ut audivi.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State against Fisler
Status
Published