Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1797

Saltar v. Administrator of Saltar

Saltar v. Administrator of Saltar
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 15, 1797
6 N.J.L. 493

Saltar v. Administrator of Saltar

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We think the application right, and that it ought to be granted.

Motion granted.

Note. — In Massachusetts it has been held, in a case of this kind, that a special count laying a promise to an administrator is unnecessary, (Baxter v. Penniman, 8 Mass. 133) though it is required in the English practice. Dean v. Crane, 1 Salk. 28.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.