Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1806

Shotwell v. Thornall

Shotwell v. Thornall
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 15, 1806
2 N.J.L. 136

Shotwell v. Thornall

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

— The action is wholly misconceived. The overseers expended the money of the township, they must *128account with the town for the money expended; and have no authority to demand the same of defendant below. If any action can be sustained, it must be by the township, in its corporate name.1

Cited in Inhabitants Saddle River v. Colfax, 1 Halst 115; Board v. Cronk, 1 Halst. 119; Taylor v. Green, 7 Halst. 124; Overs of Hobohen v. Reed, 3 Vr. 418.

Vide 7 Halst. 124. — Ed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.