Shotwell v. Thornall
Shotwell v. Thornall
3 N.J.L. 136
Shotwell v. Thornall
Opinion of the Court
— The action is wholly misconceived. The overseers expended the money of the township, they must account with the town for the money expended; and have no authority to demand the same of defendant below. If any action can be sustained, it must be by the township, in its corporate name,
Vide 7 Halst. 124. — Ed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.