Prall v. Waldron
Prall v. Waldron
Opinion
ON CERTIORARI.
Justice’s return not to be contradicted by affidavits.
■ Seyerai reasons were assigned by the plaintiff in certiorari, for the reversal of the judgment of the justice. These reasons complained of the irregularity of the proceedings of
An atempt was then made, to contradict the return of the justice, by the affidavits of by-standers. But the Court would not endure that practice, and affirmed the judgment.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- PRALL v. WALDRON
- Status
- Published