White v. Lippincott
White v. Lippincott
Opinion of the Court
— The summons is returnable the 12th of April 1806. The parties appeared on the return day. The defendant requested an adjournment, and it was granted to him till the 26th of the same month. On the day of adjournment, the parties appeared, but the witnesses did not appear, and thereupon the justice adjourned, without the request or agreement of the defendant, until the 10th of May, then next. This is more than fifteen days from the return of fhe summons; and therefore, contrary to lawr. That the defendant appeared on this last day of adjournment does not seem to me to be material, unless it can be construed into an agreement, that the adjournment should be [*] till that day. But I think this would be going too far, especially as he examined no witnesses, made no defence, took no part in the trial. Conscious that the proceeding was erroneous, he may have attended merely from curiosity, without intend
Judgment reversed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- WHITE v. LIPPINCOTT, Adm'r of WHITE
- Status
- Published