Ogden v. Dildine
Ogden v. Dildine
3 N.J.L. 413
Opinion of the Court
It hath been repeatedly decided that there must be a subsisting action depending in the justice’s court before it can be referred; this judgment is also entered in figures.; it must, for these causes, be reversed.
I. JET. Williamson, att’y for plaintiff.
Cited in Berrian v. State, 2 Zab. 9-36.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.