Darnel v. Sheldon
Darnel v. Sheldon
Opinion of the Court
[*]
not think it correct to reverse for this cause. The plaintiff demanded but one hundred dollars, and the variance of a half-cent in the credit is too small to take notice of.
We think this too strict.
There were several small articles of provisions charged, which were noted to have been lent at the time, in the plain- - tiff’s account; for which cause, the counsel for the plaintiff in error contended, that these goods lent, could not be recovered in this form of action.
But the court said, that this being a common book account, kept in a plain way, by plain people, it was well enough; and
Affirmed the judgment.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- DARNEL against SHELDON
- Status
- Published