Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1810

Groff v. Groff

Groff v. Groff
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided May 15, 1810
3 N.J.L. 657

Groff v. Groff

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

It is marked on the back by the justice, “plaintiff’s state of demand;” that is sufficient to designate it.

2d. It was then contended that the action was brought by an infant, and the process sued out in his own name, without a guardian or prochein ami.

[f]

By the Court.

It is the common practice; it is sufficient if the guardian or prochein ami is appointed before declaration; and this has been regularly done in both cases.

Let judgment be affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.