Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1810

Rice v. Oxsenius

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided May 15, 1810

3 N.J.L. 661

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

We think the state of demand not sufficiently particular; it ought at least to have stated the kind of work and labor done; and also the credit is too vague.1

Judgment reversed.

Cited is Hagerty v. Vankirk, 4 Holst. 118; Farley v. McIntyre, 1 Gr. 190; Howell v. Burnett, Spenc. 265.

Credit “ by sundries,” insufficient. Vide ante, 206, 561, 628; South. 104, 220; 4 Halst. 118.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.