Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1810

In re Highway

In re Highway
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided May 15, 1810 · Kirkpatrick, Pennington, Rossell
3 N.J.L. 666

In re Highway

Opinion of the Court

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— Was disposed to consider the act directory only; and as there was a reasonable excuse, he was for confirming the road.

Rossell, J.

— I am of opinion that the act must be strictly pursued; the operation of it is to take away a man’s freehold without his consent.

Pennington J.

— Concurred in opinion with Eossell Justice, and added, that the land-holders expected, in case the road was laid, to find the return the next term, and then oppose or appeal from it'; but if the return was permitted to come in at a subsequent term, they might be surprised. Nor did he think the excuse sufficient; if the return was completed the first day of the term, as it must have been done either in Middlesex or Monmouth, it might have been with *493great ease brought in during the term. That it was the duty of the applicants to bring up the return ; it was never expected that the Surveyors of the Highway were in their own persons, to bring into Court their return.

Rule refused.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.