Van Dorn v. Van Dorn
Van Dorn v. Van Dorn
3 N.J.L. 698
Van Dorn v. Van Dorn
Opinion of the Court
were unanimously of opinion, that the widow could recover no more than the value of the third part of the land at the time of alienation; that the improvement since the sale by the husband, was not a subject'of dower, and that the same rule was also to govern in the assessment of damages.
Judgment for the demandant accordingly.
Cited in Coxe v. Higbie 6 Halst. 395; Chiswell v. Morris, 1 McC. 101;
Barnett v. Griffith, 12 C. E Gr. 206.
Approved Wheeler v. Kirtland, 12 C. E Gr. 534.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.