Addis v. Priest
Addis v. Priest
Opinion of the Court
After an application is made to the court, for the appointment of chosen freeholders, to review a road laid out by the surveyors of the highway, the road cannot be recorded, and become a lawful highway, until it is approved by a majority of the chosen freeholders so appointed; which approbation must be certified to the court, under the signature of four of the said chosen freeholders. The fourth section of the supplement to the Road Act, declares in express terms, that the signature of four of the chosen freeholders, shall be requisite to render the return of the road made by the surveyors, valid and effectual. The second section directs the freeholders to certify their approbation to the court, and also directs the coui’t to cause the same to be recorded in the book kept for that purpose, in the office of the clerk of the county.
It appears by the case, that application was made to the court for the appointment of chosen freeholders, and that the court appointed them. It ought further to appear, that
Kirkpatrick, C. J., and Rossell, J. — Were of the same opinion.
Judgment reversed.
The Legislature on the 22d February, 1811, repealed the then existing road laws, and enacted a new one, altering the law on this subject; in which it is provided, that if the chosen freeholders, or a majority of them, shall neglect to certify that the road is unnecessary, or if the freeholders shall be equally divided, the proceedings of the surveyors shall be deemed valid and effectual; and that the clerk, by order of the court, shall record the same, and the road shall be a lawful road, from the time appointed for opening the same.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.