Chidester v. Drake

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Chidester v. Drake, 3 N.J.L. 903 (N.J. 1811)
Other, Pennington

Chidester v. Drake

Opinion of the Court

Pennington, J.

— The first, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth errors assigned, are not supported by the [*] record. The second and fourth, state no cause of reversal, even if true. The third, complains of insufficiency in the state of demand, which consists of a single charge, of a balance on *658settlement of account, on or about the 29th December, 1810, $$30 04, 'which is fully sufficient. I am of opinion, that judgment be affirmed.

Munyan, Attorney for plaintiff. The other Judges concurred.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
CHIDESTER v. DRAKE
Status
Published