Jones v. Lore
Jones v. Lore
3 N.J.L. 1049
Jones v. Lore
Opinion of the Court
is a plain act of wrong and injustice. The plaintiff should have brought his action against Steward and wife. They occupied the [*] meadow and took the profits of it, and were for the time the owners, and ought to have paid the repairs. Besides, [764] if one of the daughters were liable, the other was also; and the action should have been joint against both.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.