Schenck v. Vannest

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Schenck v. Vannest, 4 N.J.L. 329 (N.J. 1816)

Schenck v. Vannest

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

No rent was actually due. Pat. 164-The quarter had not expired. The sheriff was not bound to pay any thing to the landlord, (a) The judgment must be reversed.

Nix. Dig. 490, $ 4. See also Central Bank vs. Peterson, 4 Zab. 668. Kirkpatrick vs. Cason, 1 Vr. 331. Ayers vs. Johnson, 2 Hal. 119. Peacock vs. Hammitt, 3 Gr. 165.

Reference

Full Case Name
Martin Schenck against J. Vannest and C. Vanderveer
Status
Published