Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1817

Broadwell v. Nixon

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 15, 1817 · Kirkpatrick, Southard

4 N.J.L. 362

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Gabriel v. Auf Der Heide-Aragona, Inc. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Kirkpatrick C. J. and Southard J.

One of the most important duties of the court, is to expound the law to the jury, so as to instruct and guide it. And this duty must in no way be evaded, when the case requires it. (b) 'We think the judgment must be reversed.

Pullen vs. Boney, ante 128. Mills vs. Sleght, 2 South. 566. Sayres vs. Ward, Pen. *1010. Todd vs. Collins, 1 Hal. 127. Westcott vs. Garrison, 1 Hal. 132. Den, Wintermute vs. Wintermute, 1 Gr. 177. Youngs vs. Sunderland, 3 Gr. 32. Linn vs. Ross, 1 Har. 57. Boylston vs. Valentine, 1 Har. 347. Marshall vs. Hann, 2 Har. 429. Berry vs. Williams, 1 Zab. 428. Cole vs. Taylor, 2 Zab. 60. Folly vs. Vantuyl, 4 Hal. 153. Bellis vs. Phillips, 4 Dutch. 125. Allen vs. Wanamaker, 2 Vr. 370. Davison vs. Schooley, 5 Hal. 145.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.