Den ex dem. Flommerfelt v. Zellers

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Den ex dem. Flommerfelt v. Zellers, 7 N.J.L. 153 (N.J. 1824)
Kirkpatrick

Den ex dem. Flommerfelt v. Zellers

Opinion of the Court

Kirkpatrick, G. J.

The ground on which we decided that case was, that there was no judgment; there could not be a judgment unless something was recovered, and in-that case it did not appear what was recovered, or for wha-t judgment was ordered.

Vroom, also cited Rev. Laws 135; 14 Vin. Abr. title Judgment, letter G. A. 2; 10 Co. Rep. 77.

Curia advisare vult.

The next day the opinion of the court was delivered by

*Kirkpatrick, O. J.

The judgment offered in -evidence at the circuit was not void, but voidable-only. It was a subject of which the judge had cognizance. This authority to enter judgment in vacation was not a new authority; it was an old common law authority, and this statute only came in to regulate the matter; therefore

Let the rule for new trial be discharged.

Reference

Full Case Name
Den ex dem. Flommerfelt against Zellers
Status
Published