Gibbons v. Wade
Gibbons v. Wade
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This case comes before us on a return to a •certiorari, and a state of the case before the court of common pleas agreed upon by the parties.
In the action below, Wade, the owner of certain goods, sued Gibbons the proprietor of a boat or vessel, plying between New York and the Eising Sun ferry, near Elizabeth-town, for damage done to the goods in the course of their transportation and obtained a judgment for seventy-five dollars.
But one of the terms of the notice as appears by the return to the certiorari is, that “ that the boats are excellent and in good order, and will be kept so,”—And from the state of the case it appears, one of the witnesses for Wade testified that “ the boat was in very bad order and liable to leak.” Moreover it was contended, at the bar here, by the counsel of Wade, that the damage resulted from the negligence of the boatmen of Gibbons in not storing their goods on their arrival, but leaving them on board all night:—and one of the witnesses testified that the goods were left on board all night; that before the master and hands quit the boat they examined and found no water in her; that the goods might have been taken out of the boat and stored that evening without much trouble, and that the next morning there were five or six inches of water in the boat, and the goods wet. On the other hand it appears, a witness for Gibbons testified that the boat was a first rate boat, and in excellent order, that by reason of adverse winds she did not reach the store house until about sun set, that the master examined the boat .and freight and found all things in good order, and that it had been the custom at all the ferries when a boat arrived at the store house after sun down not to unload the freight until morning.
It is manifest then, there were questions of fact before the court of common pleas :—And that court may have rendered the judgment complained of, either because the charge of negligence was proved, or because the boat was in very bad order and liable to leak, and hence the damage to the goods;
However desirable it may be to the parties to have the opinion of this court on the legal effect of the notice given by the owner of the boat, it is evident that such opinion if now expressed, having no influence on the decision of the-cause, would be a mere obiter dictum, and from it therefore we ought to abstain.
Let the judgment be affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Thomas Gibbons v. Elias Wade
- Status
- Published