Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1830

Croxall v. Hutchings

Croxall v. Hutchings
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 15, 1830
12 N.J.L. 84

Counsel

J. S. Green, for the plaintiff, Ryerson, contra,

Croxall v. Hutchings

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The j udgment should be reversed for the insufficiency -of the affidavit. The direction of the attachment act has not been followed. Absence and non-residence are not convertible terms. The latter is required. This objection may be properly urged under the general reason.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.