Eyck v. Farlee

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Eyck v. Farlee, 16 N.J.L. 269 (N.J. 1837)
Horrbeower, Ryersoe

Eyck v. Farlee

Opinion of the Court

Horrbeower, C. J.

The appeal if regular, supersedes the verdict; and the plaintiff must proceed anjJ prove his right of action.

As to the power of the Court to dismiss an appeal, at a special term, when a jury trial is demanded, it has been decided otherwise.

Ford J. concurs.

Ryersoe J.

At a special term, no jury trial can be had, notwithstanding any rule to the contrary.

Rule to shew cause, granted.

if ote. — The rule was argued at February term 1838, and then made absolute. Yide the report, post.

Reference

Full Case Name
TEN EYCK v. FARLEE, ADMR.
Status
Published