Dickinson v. State Bank
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dickinson v. State Bank, 16 N.J.L. 354 (N.J. 1838)
Ryerson
Dickinson v. State Bank
Opinion of the Court
The practice has been for the plaintiff to have his option, either by proceeding here, or taking a procedendo.
Habeas Corpus is a common law, not statutory writ.
The statute requires bail for the plaintiff’s security, which he may waive and proceed here. So also in many cases of Certiorari, the act is equally imperative in requiring security.
Cited in Vanatta v. Morris Canal and Banking Co., 2 Harr. 159
Reference
- Full Case Name
- DICKINSON ads. STATE BANK AT MORRIS
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published