Dickinson v. State Bank

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dickinson v. State Bank, 16 N.J.L. 354 (N.J. 1838)
Ryerson

Dickinson v. State Bank

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The practice has been for the plaintiff to have his option, either by proceeding here, or taking a procedendo.

Ryerson, J.

Habeas Corpus is a common law, not statutory writ.

The statute requires bail for the plaintiff’s security, which he may waive and proceed here. So also in many cases of Certiorari, the act is equally imperative in requiring security.

Cited in Vanatta v. Morris Canal and Banking Co., 2 Harr. 159

Reference

Full Case Name
DICKINSON ads. STATE BANK AT MORRIS
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published