Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1838

Dickinson v. State Bank

Dickinson v. State Bank
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 15, 1838 · Ryerson
16 N.J.L. 354

Dickinson v. State Bank

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The practice has been for the plaintiff to have his option, either by proceeding here, or taking a procedendo.

Ryerson, J.

Habeas Corpus is a common law, not statutory writ.

The statute requires bail for the plaintiff’s security, which he may waive and proceed here. So also in many cases of Certiorari, the act is equally imperative in requiring security.

Cited in Vanatta v. Morris Canal and Banking Co., 2 Harr. 159

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.