Danser v. Boyle
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Danser v. Boyle, 16 N.J.L. 395 (N.J. 1838)
Dayton
Danser v. Boyle
Opinion of the Court
That part of the demand charging for exchange of horses, should not be stated as matter of book account, as it is here: but should be specially set forth.
This defect is not cured by its being mingled with a correct charge of the book account.
This charge could not be pleaded in bar of another suit.
Judgment reversed.
Cited in Inslee v. Prall, 3 Zab. 460.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- DANSER v. BOYLE
- Status
- Published