Mr. Schenck suggested the death of the respondent in appeal, and moved for an order making his administrators and heirs-at-law parties, and for an order of publication, some of the heirs residing in New York, and some being infants. He cited 5 Paige, 528; 4 Ib. 409, 418; 2 Peters, 481; 4 John Ch. 382.

The motion was allowed; and an order directed to be drawn according to the practice in Chancery.