Inhabitants of Phillipsburg v. Raub
Inhabitants of Phillipsburg v. Raub
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Section third of the township act (Nix. Dig. 977) provides that, “ when any suit shall be instituted against any township, a copy of the summons, precept, or such other legal process as may be issued against the said township, ■shall be left with the clerk thereof, thirty days, at least, before the session of the court to which the same shall be returnable.” This writ was tested June 28th, 1873; made returnable July 7th, 1873, and served six entire days before its return under the act for the relief of creditors against corporations. (Nix. Dig. 172, § 1.) The defendants claim that they are entitled to the benefits of the township act, by reason of section two of their charter, (Laws of 1872, p. 479.) This is a mere matter of construction, and the conclusion of the court is that, by force of the language in that section, it was the right of the defendants to be served under the township act. That being so, a question is then raised whether the service is a compliance with that act. It is said that, if the service is made in vacation, thirty clays before the ensuing term of the court, although there may not be thirty days between the service and the return, supposing the return day to be before the regular term, as in this case, that it is sufficient. This view is not f enable, because, when section three of the township act was passed, writs were necessarily made returnable in term, and the evident purpose of that section was to make at least thirty days between the service and the return. By the act of March 18th, 1851, (Nix. Dig. 732, § 6,) courts of law now always remain open for ilie return of writs of
The summons and service must be set aside.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- THE INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF PHILLIPSBURG ads. ANDREW J. RAUB
- Status
- Published