State v. Halliard
State v. Halliard
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This is a criminal case, and was tried before the Quarter Sessions of the county of Hudson. A rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted, was allowed in such court, and that rule, as to the law and facts involved, is now certified to this court by the law judge who presided, a justice of the Supreme Court not being present.
But this court cannot exercise the jurisdiction thus solicited. Such a power is not vested in this court, either by usage or statute. In cases of doubt or difficulty, the County Circuit Courts are authorized by the Practice act to certify such matters for the advisory opinion of this court, and it has been customary for the Courts of Oyer and Terminer to pursue a similar course; but such practice has arisen from the judicial habit in the English courts to reserve cases arising in criminal trials, for consideration by the whole body of judges. But such cases can be reserved only by the judges of the highest courts; and in the King’s Bench it has been directly decided that the latter court will not entertain matters sent up to them by the subordinate tribunals. In the case- of King v. Inhabitants of Salop, 13 East 95, certain questions were preferred by the Sessions on a case reserved, and Lord Ellenborough, criticizing such procedure, said: “But it is quite a new thing that a case should be reserved upon the trial of an indictment by a jury at the Sessions. It is a great irregularity, and ought to be noticed, in order to prevent the repetition of it. We shall not take notice of the case .reserved.”
It has not escaped notice that, in a few recent cases, the
By the present decision, no opinion is intended to be intimated as to the effect of a case reserved or certified by a justice of this court, when sitting in the Sessions.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN HALLIARD
- Status
- Published